[the complainant]'s proffered declarations. were completely without structure,. based totally on speculation and hearsay. The district court properly offered no credence in its opinion to such conclusory and unsupported assertions.") (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)); Johnson v. Cambridge Indus., Inc., 325 F. 3d 892, 898-99 (7th Cir.
This means that the question before us is whether the proof [the plaintiff] appropriately presented to the district court can support. his. discrimination claim or his retaliation claim."). Likewise, Research It Here or conclusions that oppose prior sworn statement can not be utilized to defeat a movement for summary judgment where there is no description or attempt to resolve the variation.
Rogers Grp., Inc., 591 F. 3d 903, 908 (7th Cir. 2010) ("A complainant can not defeat a motion for summary judgment by 'oppose [ing] deposition statement with later-filed contradictory affidavits.'") (pricing estimate Ineichen v. Ameritech, 410 F. 3d 956, 963 (7th Cir. 2005)). Accordingly, the statements included by Plaintiff for which she does not determine supporting evidence or for which that proof is inadmissible hearsay, declarations for which the evidence is contradicted without explanation, and declarations that are legal conclusions masquerading as facts will not be thought about by the Court in support of her response to the Movement for Summary Judgment, and are not included in the recitation of material facts listed below.
Product Truths Complainant Fatima Shabaz was employed by Fred Ulayyet, the president of Defendant Elder Care Insurance Coverage Services, in March 2014. Defendant remains in business of offering insurance policies. Plaintiff initially performed clerical workplace work and trained for a sales position. In September 2014, Complainant was designated to a sales position in the field.
0 
Star